<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Breakthrough Idea? Do not pay dividends! - Harvard Business School</title> <atom:link href="http://www.capital-flow-watch.net/2007/02/03/harvards-breakthrough-idea-dont-pay-dividends/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.capital-flow-watch.net/2007/02/03/harvards-breakthrough-idea-dont-pay-dividends/</link> <description>Conservative economic commentary from the top-down</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 19:34:57 -0400</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: John Schroy</title><link>http://www.capital-flow-watch.net/2007/02/03/harvards-breakthrough-idea-dont-pay-dividends/#comment-148</link> <dc:creator>John Schroy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 18:10:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://capital-flow-analysis.com/capital-flow-watch/harvards-breakthrough-idea-dont-pay-dividends.html#comment-148</guid> <description>&lt;p&gt;Obviously, in these hard times, a company would be wiser to conserve cash than pay dividends, if that is what is required for survival.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;However, if a company has a financial position that will justify dividend payments, continued dividends would be in investors&#039; interests.  Cash dividends also help break the fall in stock prices, if continued payment is likely.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The suggestion in the HBS article in 2007 was that dividend payments should come last, not first, even if management doesn&#039;t have a good idea of what to do with the money.  I think that this was a bad idea then and is still a bad idea.&lt;/p&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously, in these hard times, a company would be wiser to conserve cash than pay dividends, if that is what is required for survival.</p><p>However, if a company has a financial position that will justify dividend payments, continued dividends would be in investors&#8217; interests.  Cash dividends also help break the fall in stock prices, if continued payment is likely.</p><p>The suggestion in the HBS article in 2007 was that dividend payments should come last, not first, even if management doesn&#8217;t have a good idea of what to do with the money.  I think that this was a bad idea then and is still a bad idea.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>