<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Breakthrough Idea? Do not pay dividends! - Harvard Business School</title> <atom:link href="http://www.capital-flow-watch.net/2007/02/03/harvards-breakthrough-idea-dont-pay-dividends/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.capital-flow-watch.net/2007/02/03/harvards-breakthrough-idea-dont-pay-dividends/</link> <description>Conservative economic commentary from the top-down</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 09:51:36 -0400</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: stock calculator</title><link>http://www.capital-flow-watch.net/2007/02/03/harvards-breakthrough-idea-dont-pay-dividends/#comment-22684</link> <dc:creator>stock calculator</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 10:50:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://capital-flow-analysis.com/capital-flow-watch/harvards-breakthrough-idea-dont-pay-dividends.html#comment-22684</guid> <description>Good write-up, I am regular visitor of one’s site, maintain up the nice operate, and It&#039;s going to be a regular visitor for a lengthy time.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good write-up, I am regular visitor of one’s site, maintain up the nice operate, and It&#8217;s going to be a regular visitor for a lengthy time.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: John Schroy</title><link>http://www.capital-flow-watch.net/2007/02/03/harvards-breakthrough-idea-dont-pay-dividends/#comment-148</link> <dc:creator>John Schroy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 18:10:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://capital-flow-analysis.com/capital-flow-watch/harvards-breakthrough-idea-dont-pay-dividends.html#comment-148</guid> <description>&lt;p&gt;Obviously, in these hard times, a company would be wiser to conserve cash than pay dividends, if that is what is required for survival.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;However, if a company has a financial position that will justify dividend payments, continued dividends would be in investors&#039; interests.  Cash dividends also help break the fall in stock prices, if continued payment is likely.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The suggestion in the HBS article in 2007 was that dividend payments should come last, not first, even if management doesn&#039;t have a good idea of what to do with the money.  I think that this was a bad idea then and is still a bad idea.&lt;/p&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously, in these hard times, a company would be wiser to conserve cash than pay dividends, if that is what is required for survival.</p><p>However, if a company has a financial position that will justify dividend payments, continued dividends would be in investors&#8217; interests.  Cash dividends also help break the fall in stock prices, if continued payment is likely.</p><p>The suggestion in the HBS article in 2007 was that dividend payments should come last, not first, even if management doesn&#8217;t have a good idea of what to do with the money.  I think that this was a bad idea then and is still a bad idea.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ed Stan</title><link>http://www.capital-flow-watch.net/2007/02/03/harvards-breakthrough-idea-dont-pay-dividends/#comment-147</link> <dc:creator>Ed Stan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 19:20:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://capital-flow-analysis.com/capital-flow-watch/harvards-breakthrough-idea-dont-pay-dividends.html#comment-147</guid> <description>&lt;p&gt;This 2007 article, has it been updated to coincide with 2009 financial conditions?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Please advise&lt;/p&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This 2007 article, has it been updated to coincide with 2009 financial conditions?</p><p>Please advise</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dividends: a bad corporate strategy? - Early Retirement Forums</title><link>http://www.capital-flow-watch.net/2007/02/03/harvards-breakthrough-idea-dont-pay-dividends/#comment-146</link> <dc:creator>Dividends: a bad corporate strategy? - Early Retirement Forums</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 21:54:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://capital-flow-analysis.com/capital-flow-watch/harvards-breakthrough-idea-dont-pay-dividends.html#comment-146</guid> <description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Dividends: a bad corporate strategy?     I just came across this 2007 blog comment on a Harvard Business Review article: Harvard?s Breakthrough Idea: Don?t Pay Dividends! ::: Capital Flow Watch.  Unfortunately, I can&#039;t access the original HBR article (not without paying a $6.50 fee, anyway). But reportedly it advocated the stupid &#34;breakthrough idea&#34; that, when faced with excess cash, management should waste the money on an acquiition strategy, notwithstanding inflated prices.  I am not so na?ve as to think that this sort of warped corporate thinking doesn&#039;t secretly happen all the time. But it&#039;s rather shocking to see it publicly lauded by the Harvard Business School.     __________________ &#34;There is no more dreadful punishment than futile and hopeless labour&#34; - Albert Camus [...]&lt;/p&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Dividends: a bad corporate strategy?     I just came across this 2007 blog comment on a Harvard Business Review article: Harvard?s Breakthrough Idea: Don?t Pay Dividends! ::: Capital Flow Watch.  Unfortunately, I can&#8217;t access the original HBR article (not without paying a $6.50 fee, anyway). But reportedly it advocated the stupid &#38;#34;breakthrough idea&#38;#34; that, when faced with excess cash, management should waste the money on an acquiition strategy, notwithstanding inflated prices.  I am not so na?ve as to think that this sort of warped corporate thinking doesn&#8217;t secretly happen all the time. But it&#8217;s rather shocking to see it publicly lauded by the Harvard Business School.     __________________ &#38;#34;There is no more dreadful punishment than futile and hopeless labour&#38;#34; &#8211; Albert Camus [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
