Subject:
efficient market hypothesis In finance, the efficient-market hypothesis (EMH) asserts that financial markets are “informationally efficient”, or that prices on traded assets (e.g., stocks, bonds, or property) already reflect all known information, and instantly change to reflect new information. Therefore, according to theory, it is impossible to consistently outperform the market by using any information that the market already knows, except through luck. Information or news in the EMH is defined as anything that may affect prices that is unknowable in the present and thus appears randomly in the future. The hypothesis has been attacked lately by critics who blame belief in rational markets for much of the current financial crisis, with noted financial journalist Roger Lowenstein recently declaring “The upside of the current Great Recession is that it could drive a stake through the heart of the academic nostrum known as the efficient-market hypothesis.” (Wikipedia Jan 2010)
Efficient Market Hypothesis
By John Schroy, on June 27th, 2006 |

In an editorial published on June 27, 2006, Burton G. Malkiel joined with John C. Bogle of the Vanguard Group, to fight for “capitalization-weighted indexing” against the insurgency of Jeremy Siegel, Eugene Fama, Robert Arnott, and Kenneth French, proponents of a heretical notion of “fundamental-weighted indexing”.
The first casualty in this war has been the Efficient Market Hypothesis, first nicked by Professor Siegel in his opening article.
Q1 2006 Stock Buybacks
By John Schroy, on June 20th, 2006 |

Massive issuance of bonds by non-financial corporations, largely to finance an extraordinary level of stock buybacks, helped force bond interest rates upwards in Q1 2006. For years, the principal issuers of corporate bonds into the US market have been the financial sectors — mainly issuers of asset-backed securities raising funds for mortgages and consumer finance.
The annualized rate of bond issuance by non-financial corporate business rose to $240.4 billion in Q1 2006, four times the issuance rate of 2005.
Q1 2006
By John Schroy, on June 18th, 2006 |

Federal Reserve flow of funds accounts for Q1 2006 show the degree to which equity investments have fallen out of favor with individual investors.
In the year 2000, about 80% of the money that flowed to mutual funds was directed to the equity market.
After the crash, by 2002 less than 20% of net mutual fund sales were allocated to the stock market.
Popular Articles