Subject:
Investment Company Institute The Investment Company Institute (ICI) is the national association of U.S. investment companies. ICI encourages adherence to high ethical standards, promotes public understanding of funds and investing, and advances the interests of investment funds and their shareholders, directors, and advisers.
As of July 1, 2008, ICI membership included 9,067 mutual funds, 675 closed-end funds, 625 exchange-traded funds (ETFs), and three sponsors of unit investment trust (UITs). Members manage assets totalling $12.9 trillion and serve almost 90 million shareholders.
In the aftermath of stock market scandals in the 1920s and 1930s, ICI was established in 1940 in New York as the National Committee of Investment Companies. It became the National Association of Investment Companies (NAIC) in 1941. NAIC changed its name to the Investment Company Institute in 1961.
ICI membership is open to Securities and Exchange Commission-registered investment companies (mutual funds, closed-end funds, ETFs, and UITs), their investment advisers, and underwriters. The Institute advocates on behalf of its members with federal, state, and foreign regulators and legislatures. (Wikipedia Jan 2010)
Victory for fund managers?
By John Schroy, on August 8th, 2006 |

The Pension Protection Act of 2006 is a major piece of legislation that, like ERISA in the 1970s, will effect capital flows in the US market over the next generation.
Passage of the bill was helped along by heavy lobbying by the mutual fund industry trade organization, the Investment Company Institute.
Although considered favorable to fund managers, the long run impact is still uncertain.
Economic Theory
By John Schroy, on June 17th, 2006 |

The Efficient Market Hypothesis continues to impede understanding of how capital markets work. This hypothesis suggests that world capital markets are guided by crowds of rational, competing, profit-maximizers, each trying to predict future market values of individual securities.
The Efficient Market Hypothesis has never been proven. Indeed, no serious attempt has ever been made to subject this hypothesis to scientific scrutiny.
Stock buybacks 2005
By John Schroy, on March 22nd, 2006 |
Comments are closed 
A careful examination of the flow of fund accounts for 2005 suggests that probably not more than ten to twenty percent of proceeds from the exercise of stock options were channeled back into the stock market. In order for ordinary investors to benefit from the buyback option programs, they would have to sell 3.5% of their indirect holdings in equities and put the money elsewhere.
Without doubt, such sudden ‘rational behavior’ would crash the stock market.
Popular Articles